Data & decision systems / PROPOSED CONCEPT
Retrofit evidence planner.
Building baseline review. Intervention comparison.
The opportunity
A real need.
A considered response.
Retrofit choices require a credible baseline, building constraints and comparable interventions. A planner can organise the evidence and reveal which assumptions still need an on-site assessment.
DESIGNED AROUND
Building owners, energy assessors and facilities teams.
What would this look like for you?
Ask the architect to connect this concept to your systems, or challenge its assumptions.
The experience
What this could make possible.
Intervention comparison
Evidence and constraint mapping
Assessor handoff
01
Collect building evidence
→02
Validate the baseline
→03
Compare bounded scenarios
→04
Prepare an assessor brief
Under the surface
The engineering
behind the experience.
Architecture is a starting hypothesis. Discovery and representative tests decide what belongs in the first build.
POTENTIAL CONNECTIONSBuilding management exportUtility consumption recordsAsset and envelope survey
01Architecture to explore+
- Meter and building-record normalisation
- Transparent baseline calculations
- Scenario assumptions with uncertainty ranges
- Source-linked intervention evidence
02Integration dependencies+
Building management export, Utility consumption records, Asset and envelope survey. Confirm access, data ownership, update frequency and failure behaviour during discovery.
03Validation and human control+
Check missing baseline data, sensitivity to assumptions and agreement with assessor analysis. No promises of savings, formal credentials or structural recommendations. On-site specialists validate the plan.
A useful first step
Start small.
Learn something real.
One building and a few assessor-selected interventions using measured consumption.
Evidence to look for
Check missing baseline data, sensitivity to assumptions and agreement with assessor analysis.
A boundary to design for
No promises of savings, formal credentials or structural recommendations. On-site specialists validate the plan.
Proposed scope, not a delivery commitment. Data, permissions, operational constraints and sector requirements need review before implementation.
Connected capabilities
AI Agents & Workflow AutomationKnowledge & Document AIBackend, API & Integration EngineeringResearch behind the direction
UNEP / GlobalABCGlobal Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2025–2026 ↗AnthropicBuilding effective agents ↗AnthropicDemystifying evals for AI agents ↗These sources inform technical possibilities. They do not demonstrate a Tomatrix deployment or endorse this proposed product.
From possibility to a conversation
Make this
your starting point.
Add a little context. Preview a practical brief, then keep it for a conversation with Tomatrix.
Built locally from this concept. No AI service is called and nothing is submitted. Please leave out confidential information.
Preview your concept brief
PRODUCT EXPLORATION: Retrofit evidence planner Status: Proposed concept — scope and feasibility to be agreed. Our context: To be discussed. Who this could help: Building owners, energy assessors and facilities teams. A useful first pilot: One building and a few assessor-selected interventions using measured consumption. What to evaluate: Check missing baseline data, sensitivity to assumptions and agreement with assessor analysis. Important boundary: No promises of savings, formal credentials or structural recommendations. On-site specialists validate the plan. Integrations to explore: Building management export, Utility consumption records, Asset and envelope survey Concept reference: /products/building-retrofit
Keep exploring
Related possibilities.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
EV charging assurance desk ↗
Failed-session investigation. Connector health context.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Irrigation scenario planner ↗
Field-zone water context. Moisture and forecast comparison.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Inventory planning workspace ↗
See the assumptions behind the next order.