Knowledge & reasoning / PROPOSED CONCEPT
Contract evidence workspace.
Find the clause. Preserve the context.
The opportunity
A real need.
A considered response.
Reviewers need to compare clauses, identify missing material and trace each observation back to the document. A workspace prepares the evidence without presenting model output as legal advice.
DESIGNED AROUND
Qualified legal and procurement reviewers.
What would this look like for you?
Ask the architect to connect this concept to your systems, or challenge its assumptions.
The experience
What this could make possible.
Document comparison
Review checklists
Source and version tracking
01
Add permitted documents
→02
Map clauses and versions
→03
Prepare comparison notes
→04
Review with a professional
Under the surface
The engineering
behind the experience.
Architecture is a starting hypothesis. Discovery and representative tests decide what belongs in the first build.
POTENTIAL CONNECTIONSDocument-management systemClause libraryReview export
01Architecture to explore+
- Document segmentation and retrieval
- Structured comparison against a chosen rubric
- Document permissions and immutable source versions
02Integration dependencies+
Document-management system, Clause library, Review export. Confirm access, data ownership, update frequency and failure behaviour during discovery.
03Validation and human control+
Test citation localisation, missed clauses and unsupported interpretations. A qualified professional interprets legal effect and approves decisions. Jurisdiction and confidentiality matter.
A useful first step
Start small.
Learn something real.
One contract family and an expert-reviewed comparison rubric.
Evidence to look for
Test citation localisation, missed clauses and unsupported interpretations.
A boundary to design for
A qualified professional interprets legal effect and approves decisions. Jurisdiction and confidentiality matter.
Proposed scope, not a delivery commitment. Data, permissions, operational constraints and sector requirements need review before implementation.
Research behind the direction
Microsoft ResearchGraphRAG and dynamic community selection ↗AnthropicDemystifying evals for AI agents ↗These sources inform technical possibilities. They do not demonstrate a Tomatrix deployment or endorse this proposed product.
From possibility to a conversation
Make this
your starting point.
Add a little context. Preview a practical brief, then keep it for a conversation with Tomatrix.
Built locally from this concept. No AI service is called and nothing is submitted. Please leave out confidential information.
Preview your concept brief
PRODUCT EXPLORATION: Contract evidence workspace Status: Proposed concept — scope and feasibility to be agreed. Our context: To be discussed. Who this could help: Qualified legal and procurement reviewers. A useful first pilot: One contract family and an expert-reviewed comparison rubric. What to evaluate: Test citation localisation, missed clauses and unsupported interpretations. Important boundary: A qualified professional interprets legal effect and approves decisions. Jurisdiction and confidentiality matter. Integrations to explore: Document-management system, Clause library, Review export Concept reference: /products/contract-review
Keep exploring
Related possibilities.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Workshop evidence copilot ↗
Fault-code evidence retrieval. Vehicle-specific bulletin matching.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Prior-authorisation workbench ↗
Requirement-to-evidence mapping. Missing-document review.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Curriculum planning studio ↗
Objective-to-lesson mapping. Source-grounded activities.