Knowledge & reasoning / PROPOSED CONCEPT

Prior-authorisation workbench.

Requirement-to-evidence mapping. Missing-document review.

Feasibility firstHealthcare ↗
AI-generated concept: A prior-authorisation workspace comparing a source document with required evidence.
AI-GENERATED CONCEPT

The opportunity

A real need.
A considered response.

Preparing a coverage request requires assembling the right evidence against the right requirements. A workbench can reveal missing documentation and maintain a trace from each prepared statement to its source.

DESIGNED AROUND

Authorisation coordinators and clinical reviewers.

What would this look like for you?

Ask the architect to connect this concept to your systems, or challenge its assumptions.

Explore with the AI architect ↗

The experience

What this could make possible.

01

Requirement-to-evidence mapping

02

Missing-document review

03

Draft request preparation

04

Human submission control

01

Choose the applicable policy

02

Collect permitted evidence

03

Prepare a cited draft

04

Review before submission

Under the surface

The engineering
behind the experience.

Architecture is a starting hypothesis. Discovery and representative tests decide what belongs in the first build.

POTENTIAL CONNECTIONSPayer policy repositoryEHR document exportAuthorisation work queue
01Architecture to explore
  • Versioned payer-policy retrieval
  • Structured extraction with confidence and source localisation
  • Deterministic checklist validation
  • Clinician and administrator approval stages
02Integration dependencies

Payer policy repository, EHR document export, Authorisation work queue. Confirm access, data ownership, update frequency and failure behaviour during discovery.

03Validation and human control

Measure evidence coverage, wrong-policy references and fabricated or omitted claims. No automatic coverage decisions, medical-necessity judgements or submissions. Local privacy and payer requirements need review.

A useful first step

Start small.
Learn something real.

One request family using synthetic or de-identified cases and expert-reviewed requirements.

Evidence to look for

Measure evidence coverage, wrong-policy references and fabricated or omitted claims.

A boundary to design for

No automatic coverage decisions, medical-necessity judgements or submissions. Local privacy and payer requirements need review.

Proposed scope, not a delivery commitment. Data, permissions, operational constraints and sector requirements need review before implementation.

From possibility to a conversation

Make this
your starting point.

Add a little context. Preview a practical brief, then keep it for a conversation with Tomatrix.

Built locally from this concept. No AI service is called and nothing is submitted. Please leave out confidential information.

Preview your concept brief
PRODUCT EXPLORATION: Prior-authorisation workbench

Status: Proposed concept — scope and feasibility to be agreed.

Our context:
To be discussed.

Who this could help:
Authorisation coordinators and clinical reviewers.

A useful first pilot:
One request family using synthetic or de-identified cases and expert-reviewed requirements.

What to evaluate:
Measure evidence coverage, wrong-policy references and fabricated or omitted claims.

Important boundary:
No automatic coverage decisions, medical-necessity judgements or submissions. Local privacy and payer requirements need review.

Integrations to explore:
Payer policy repository, EHR document export, Authorisation work queue

Concept reference: /products/prior-auth-workbench

Keep exploring

Related possibilities.

Back to the library
Explore with AI