Knowledge & reasoning / PROPOSED CONCEPT
Connected knowledge map.
Find the relationship, not just the document.
The opportunity
A real need.
A considered response.
A keyword search can miss how a decision, customer or system relates to the rest of the organisation. A knowledge map makes these relationships available for exploration with their evidence.
DESIGNED AROUND
Teams navigating interconnected projects, policies and technical knowledge.
The experience
What this could make possible.
Source-linked answers
Access-aware retrieval
Freshness and ownership metadata
01
Connect approved records
→02
Resolve entities
→03
Explore related evidence
→04
Review an answer
Under the surface
The engineering
behind the experience.
Architecture is a starting hypothesis. Discovery and representative tests decide what belongs in the first build.
POTENTIAL CONNECTIONSInternal wikiDocument libraryProject database
01Architecture to explore+
- Hybrid retrieval with optional graph indexing
- Document-level permission enforcement
- Incremental refresh and entity-resolution review
02Integration dependencies+
Internal wiki, Document library, Project database. Confirm access, data ownership, update frequency and failure behaviour during discovery.
03Validation and human control+
Evaluate cross-document questions, stale evidence and permission leakage. Graph construction adds cost and can encode incorrect relationships. Use it where the comparison supports it.
A useful first step
Start small.
Learn something real.
One knowledge domain; compare graph-assisted answers with a simpler hybrid-search baseline.
Evidence to look for
Evaluate cross-document questions, stale evidence and permission leakage.
A boundary to design for
Graph construction adds cost and can encode incorrect relationships. Use it where the comparison supports it.
Proposed scope, not a delivery commitment. Data, permissions, operational constraints and sector requirements need review before implementation.
Research behind the direction
Microsoft ResearchGraphRAG and dynamic community selection ↗These sources inform technical possibilities. They do not demonstrate a Tomatrix deployment or endorse this proposed product.
From possibility to a conversation
Make this
your starting point.
Add a little context. Preview a practical brief, then keep it for a conversation with Tomatrix.
Built locally from this concept. No AI service is called and nothing is submitted. Please leave out confidential information.
Preview your concept brief
PRODUCT EXPLORATION: Connected knowledge map Status: Proposed concept — scope and feasibility to be agreed. Our context: To be discussed. Who this could help: Teams navigating interconnected projects, policies and technical knowledge. A useful first pilot: One knowledge domain; compare graph-assisted answers with a simpler hybrid-search baseline. What to evaluate: Evaluate cross-document questions, stale evidence and permission leakage. Important boundary: Graph construction adds cost and can encode incorrect relationships. Use it where the comparison supports it. Integrations to explore: Internal wiki, Document library, Project database Concept reference: /products/enterprise-memory
Keep exploring
Related possibilities.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Workshop evidence copilot ↗
Fault-code evidence retrieval. Vehicle-specific bulletin matching.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Prior-authorisation workbench ↗
Requirement-to-evidence mapping. Missing-document review.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Curriculum planning studio ↗
Objective-to-lesson mapping. Source-grounded activities.