Knowledge & reasoning / PROPOSED CONCEPT
Research with evidence.
From a question to a brief you can inspect.
The opportunity
A real need.
A considered response.
Useful research requires checking what a source actually supports. A research workspace can gather approved material, connect claims to passages and separate facts from open questions.
DESIGNED AROUND
Research, strategy and business-development teams.
The experience
What this could make possible.
Claim-to-source links
Contradiction review
Exportable decision briefs
01
Define the question
→02
Collect permitted evidence
→03
Organise supported findings
→04
Review the brief
Under the surface
The engineering
behind the experience.
Architecture is a starting hypothesis. Discovery and representative tests decide what belongs in the first build.
POTENTIAL CONNECTIONSKnowledge repositorySearch providerDocument export
01Architecture to explore+
- Search and retrieval over a bounded source set
- Structured claim and citation records
- A coverage check for unsupported or conflicting statements
02Integration dependencies+
Knowledge repository, Search provider, Document export. Confirm access, data ownership, update frequency and failure behaviour during discovery.
03Validation and human control+
Assess citation correctness, source coverage and unsupported claims. Source links are not proof of truth. A reviewer checks material conclusions and licensing.
A useful first step
Start small.
Learn something real.
One research topic and a small approved source set, reviewed against a human-written brief.
Evidence to look for
Assess citation correctness, source coverage and unsupported claims.
A boundary to design for
Source links are not proof of truth. A reviewer checks material conclusions and licensing.
Proposed scope, not a delivery commitment. Data, permissions, operational constraints and sector requirements need review before implementation.
Connected capabilities
Knowledge & Document AIGenerative AI & LLM DevelopmentAI Evaluation & OptimisationResearch behind the direction
Microsoft ResearchGraphRAG and dynamic community selection ↗AnthropicBuilding effective agents ↗These sources inform technical possibilities. They do not demonstrate a Tomatrix deployment or endorse this proposed product.
From possibility to a conversation
Make this
your starting point.
Add a little context. Preview a practical brief, then keep it for a conversation with Tomatrix.
Built locally from this concept. No AI service is called and nothing is submitted. Please leave out confidential information.
Preview your concept brief
PRODUCT EXPLORATION: Research with evidence Status: Proposed concept — scope and feasibility to be agreed. Our context: To be discussed. Who this could help: Research, strategy and business-development teams. A useful first pilot: One research topic and a small approved source set, reviewed against a human-written brief. What to evaluate: Assess citation correctness, source coverage and unsupported claims. Important boundary: Source links are not proof of truth. A reviewer checks material conclusions and licensing. Integrations to explore: Knowledge repository, Search provider, Document export Concept reference: /products/grounded-research
Keep exploring
Related possibilities.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Workshop evidence copilot ↗
Fault-code evidence retrieval. Vehicle-specific bulletin matching.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Prior-authorisation workbench ↗
Requirement-to-evidence mapping. Missing-document review.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Curriculum planning studio ↗
Objective-to-lesson mapping. Source-grounded activities.