Knowledge & reasoning / PROPOSED CONCEPT
Proposal preparation workbench.
From a client brief to a reviewed proposal draft.
Proposed concept — not a released product or client work.
The opportunity
A real need.
A considered response.
Each proposal restarts from old documents and scattered notes. A workbench maps the client’s requirements to approved past content and shows what is still missing, so the team spends its time on the substance.
DESIGNED AROUND
Sales, bid and delivery teams preparing proposals and tender responses.
The experience
What this could make possible.
Approved content library with sources
Gap and open-question list
Response compliance checklist
01
Upload the brief or RFP
→02
Map requirements to approved content
→03
Draft sections with sources
→04
Review, price and approve
Under the surface
The engineering
behind the experience.
Architecture is a starting hypothesis. Discovery and representative tests decide what belongs in the first build.
POTENTIAL CONNECTIONSDocument storeCRM opportunity recordTender portal or document export
01Architecture to explore+
- Retrieval over an approved, versioned content library
- Requirement-to-section traceability matrix
- Evaluation set of past proposals and reviewer edits
02Integration dependencies+
Document store, CRM opportunity record, Tender portal or document export. Confirm access, data ownership, update frequency and failure behaviour during discovery.
03Validation and human control+
Compare drafting hours, requirement coverage and the number of reviewer corrections per section. Pricing, legal terms and delivery commitments are written and approved by people. No draft reaches a client unreviewed.
A useful first step
Start small.
Learn something real.
One proposal type, a curated library of past sections and three live bids prepared side by side with the current process.
Evidence to look for
Compare drafting hours, requirement coverage and the number of reviewer corrections per section.
A boundary to design for
Pricing, legal terms and delivery commitments are written and approved by people. No draft reaches a client unreviewed.
Proposed scope, not a delivery commitment. Data, permissions, operational constraints and sector requirements need review before implementation.
Connected capabilities
Generative AI & LLM DevelopmentKnowledge & Document AIAI Evaluation & OptimisationResearch behind the direction
AnthropicBuilding effective agents ↗AnthropicDemystifying evals for AI agents ↗Microsoft ResearchGraphRAG and dynamic community selection ↗These sources inform technical possibilities. They do not demonstrate a Tomatrix deployment or endorse this proposed product.
From possibility to a conversation
Make this
your starting point.
Add a little context. Preview a practical brief, then keep it for a conversation with Tomatrix.
Built locally from this concept. No AI service is called and nothing is submitted. Please leave out confidential information.
Preview your concept brief
PRODUCT EXPLORATION: Proposal preparation workbench Status: Proposed concept — scope and feasibility to be agreed. Our context: To be discussed. Who this could help: Sales, bid and delivery teams preparing proposals and tender responses. A useful first pilot: One proposal type, a curated library of past sections and three live bids prepared side by side with the current process. What to evaluate: Compare drafting hours, requirement coverage and the number of reviewer corrections per section. Important boundary: Pricing, legal terms and delivery commitments are written and approved by people. No draft reaches a client unreviewed. Integrations to explore: Document store, CRM opportunity record, Tender portal or document export Concept reference: /products/proposal-workbench
Keep exploring
Related possibilities.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Workshop evidence copilot ↗
Fault-code evidence retrieval. Vehicle-specific bulletin matching.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Prior-authorisation workbench ↗
Requirement-to-evidence mapping. Missing-document review.
PROPOSED CONCEPT
Curriculum planning studio ↗
Objective-to-lesson mapping. Source-grounded activities.